![]() |
Covering the Front and Back Pages of the Newspaper
September 09, 2004
POLITICS: More Republican Liars?
“Little did the American prisoners of war imagine that half a world away events were conspiring to make their precarious situation even more desperate. That an American Naval Lieutenant after a 4-month tour of duty in Vietnam was meeting secretly in an undisclosed location in Paris with a top enemy diplomat. That this same lieutenant would later join forces with Jane Fonda to form an anti-war group of so-called Vietnam veterans, some of whom would be later discovered as frauds who never set foot on a battlefield. All this culminating in John Kerry’s Senate testimony that would be blared over loud speakers to convince our prisoners that back home they were being accused and abandoned. Enemy propagandists had found a new and willing accomplice.” That's from Stolen Honor, a new documentary (independent of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth but featuring some of the same former POWs) expanding at length on the excesses of John Kerry's "war crimes" testimony and the harm it caused. Go here and see if you think these guys are just another bunch of lying, crooked Republican attack dogs. Just for one example of a guy who appears in "Stolen Honor" and has also supported the Swift Boat group, check out this bio on "Bud" Day, who doesn't strike me as the kind of guy you want challenging your activities in wartime:
Comments
“...an American Naval Lieutenant after a 4-month tour of duty in Vietnam" Golly, only four months? Actually, the 4-month tour (abbreviated by three Purple Hearts and a transfer stateside) was Kerry's second tour after already serving for a year in the Sea of Japan. That's sixteen months. By this logic, they should have just said "after a few days in Vietnam" if they're going to dramatically misrepresent Kerry's service. I mean, it's technically true... Posted by: Mr Furious at September 10, 2004 01:22 PMIf the question is, "did Kerry serve," the answer is "two tours of duty in the Navy." If the question is, "did he see combat" or "was he in Vietnam," the answer is "four months." In this context, they're contrasting his war experience with their own years there. Posted by: The Crank at September 10, 2004 01:26 PMFair enough. The comparison is between Kerry and the other vets, not Kerry and Bush (as I am so accustomed to), so the four month point is valid. Posted by: Mr Furious at September 12, 2004 12:36 AMPost a comment
|