![]() |
Covering the Front and Back Pages of the Newspaper
October 2, 2007
POLITICS: Spitzer Loses Interest In Law Enforcement
NY Gov. Eliot Spitzer has kicked up yet another firestorm with his latest genius idea, to issue drivers' licenses to illegal aliens: All New Yorkers are now entitled to earn a driver's license, regardless of immigration status, under an administrative policy change Gov. Eliot Spitzer announced Friday. +++ New anti-fraud measures will be implemented to increase the security of licensing, officials said. The DMV will use new document verification technology, photo-comparison tools, and staff specially trained in foreign-source identifications. People need to prove New York residency to obtain a license. +++ The Social Security number requirement was implemented in 1995 as part of an effort to punish parents for not paying child support. In 2002, the state began allowing people ineligible for Social Security numbers to apply for licenses. A subsequent administrative policy change required proof of ineligibility from the Social Security Administration, a document only available to legal immigrants, thus making it impossible for illegal immigrants to get licenses. Unsurprisingly, this issue has unified New York's Republicans and Conservatives, ranging from Presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani to State Senate President Joe Bruno to erstwhile Republican Mayor Mike Bloomberg to the state's bumptious Conservative Party: "Today's directive to the Department of Motor Vehicles to no longer require provide Social Security numbers, or proof that they are eligible for Social Security cards, will certainly make it easier for illegal immigrants to obtain valid identification to blend into society," said Michael Long, state chairman of the Conservative Party. The State Senate isn't just talking, either, and it looks as if it may have the votes to force a showdown with the ham-handed Spitzer: In an effort to stop what they deem an ill-advised order from Governor Spitzer that could jeopardize the safety and security of New Yorkers, the New York State Senate will act on legislation next month to prohibit the state from issuing drivers licenses to illegal aliens. The legislation would require a social security number or proof of authorized presence in the United States to obtain a New York State drivers license. +++ The legislation the Senate will take up next month is similar to bills proposed by Senator Frank Padavan (Queens) that would require applicants for a drivers license or non-driver identification card, to submit satisfactory proof to the Department of Motor Vehicles that the applicant’s presence in the United States is authorized under federal law (S.74); and legislation (S.6250), passed by the Senate in June, sponsored by Senator John Flanagan (R-C, East Northport), that would require the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to obtain proof from any applicant for a drivers license or nondriver identification card who cannot provide a social security number, that they are ineligible for a social security number. The Assembly did not act on this bill. More here from a Staten Island Republican, and here for more from Rensselaer County Clerk Frank Merola, who insists he will not follow the new policy: "I've been with the DMV 20 years, I've seen a lot of crazy things. This is the worst," Merola said of the governor's plan. "My stomach is in knots. I just don't understand how I can issue a driver's license to a person who can't prove they're here legally. If they want to put 'undocumented' across the top of it, that would be just fine, but they went just the opposite. Giuliani, who has been under fire from Mitt Romney for policies tolerant of illegal aliens while Mayor but who has been running on a platform of requiring better identification of those who enter the country legally, ripped the plan: "I think it would just create an even further level of fraud and confusion in what is already a very confusing picture," said Mr. Giuliani . . . Like Mayor Giuliani, I'm sympathetic to the problem of how you deal with a large illegal alien population without exacerbating the problem by having - in this case - scores of uninsured drivers on the roads. But so long as the drivers' license is used as a proxy identification card for broader purposes (which it will be in practice for some time despite federal efforts to improve on the situation), licenses that do not in any way reflect on their face that they were issued without proof of legal residency will only make the situation worse. Spitzer seems to have forgotten yet again that New York is particularly vulnerable to terrorism: Certain facts about terrorist operations are beyond dispute, and as the 9/11 Commission noted, one is that terrorists cannot function without I.D. The sixty-three authentic U.S. driver's licenses the 9/11 terrorists held (from Virginia, Florida, Maryland and other states) permitted them to blend in as ordinary U.S. citizens; permitted them to rent cars, open bank accounts, rent hotel rooms, obtain credit cards, etc. They used them when purchasing flying lessons. And on the morning of 9/11, their U.S. licenses were the "valid ID" that got them on board the planes they used as missiles. Naturally, Spitzer's allies on the Left are lining up behind him - the AFL-CIO, the NY Civil Liberties Union, and of course, the NY Times. These are, of course, the same folks who invariably line up to protest requirements that even the most basic forms of identification - such as, yes, the drivers' license - be presented before you can vote (an issue now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court). All of which suggests the real priority here, which is to find new and different ways to enlarge the Left's political base outside of the pool of U.S. citizens. Comments
"obtain driver licenses in a responsible and secure manner will help increase public safety" And if anyone can really argue that it will increase safety - make the policy to include a big "TEMPORARY VISITOR DL", which I think is what FL, AZ, TN and IL do. And add "NOT FOR AIRPORT TRAVEL". Then again, I think driver's licenses are handed out far, far too easily in this country, but that's another problem. Posted by: Dave at October 2, 2007 10:55 PMAs a resident of NY State (but not NYC!) I can say Spitzer is an Idiot! This soon after he takes office we are wishing for Pataki back! How can that be? I was never a big Pataki fan. I thought he would be a one termer at most but after just a short time under Spitzer... BTW, while I am a Republican this is not an anti-Democratic thing. I just want a good govenor of NY so we can get our tax mess straightened out and start growing instead of shrinking. I had some hope Spitzer might be able to get something done but he is not doing well to start out. Posted by: Lee at October 3, 2007 10:49 AMFunny Lee, I had the same reaction and expectation. Thinking that The Bulldozer had his eye on bigger things, I expected his first term to be a dramatic improvement over the utterly useless Pataki. Not so much, the guy seems deeply troubled. At some point his admin will have to drop the Troopergate cover up. As a policy this is poor, and his attack in response to Bloomberg's objections was way over the top. Mayor Mike has been a friend to the Gov as he navigates choppy waters. If that's the response to a friend, and we know he pursues scorched Earth vs enemies, he will be a lonely, failed one termer. And if he is implicated in Troopergate, Langone and Grasso will have the last laugh. Posted by: abe at October 3, 2007 12:10 PMMad? Go to wgy.com. Under "on air" click on Al Roney. On the right hand side he has info on this--and a link to a forum that a listener started. They are talking about a rally in Albany on 10/22. If you are interested, join the discussion. If you can't make it, spread the word. Posted by: DisgustedUpstateNYer at October 6, 2007 4:18 PM
|